Comments on: Major Improvements to GeoffMyers.net http://geoffmyers.net/blog/2007/09/21/major-improvements-to-geoffmyersnet/ The weblog of Geoff Myers, a 17-year old Mac geek, photographer, and musician Mon, 21 Apr 2008 08:43:16 -0600 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1 hourly 1 By: Geoff Myers http://geoffmyers.net/blog/2007/09/21/major-improvements-to-geoffmyersnet/comment-page-1/#comment-46 Geoff Myers Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:30:50 +0000 http://geoffmyers.net/blog/?p=22#comment-46 Thanks to both of you for your feedback! :) Thanks to both of you for your feedback! :)

]]> By: Marcus http://geoffmyers.net/blog/2007/09/21/major-improvements-to-geoffmyersnet/comment-page-1/#comment-45 Marcus Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:17:09 +0000 http://geoffmyers.net/blog/?p=22#comment-45 Hey, I really like the new site. The new features and design changes are great. The new blog template is also very nice! Marcus Harun Hey,
I really like the new site. The new features and design changes are great. The new blog template is also very nice!

Marcus Harun

]]> By: Biscuitrat http://geoffmyers.net/blog/2007/09/21/major-improvements-to-geoffmyersnet/comment-page-1/#comment-21 Biscuitrat Sun, 23 Sep 2007 15:37:03 +0000 http://geoffmyers.net/blog/?p=22#comment-21 Oh no, not Snap Shots! That's an internet faux pas :( I actually really do prefer the old template. It's a lot more calm, organized, and easy to read. The new one has a lot of trouble helping the reader distinguish between posts. That and the new version is very crowded — there's a lot of unnecessary stuff on the home page. And, even if it's CSS-validated, it still has about 56 HTML errors, so you're still probably better off with the old one, provided that you validate its CSS :/ Oh no, not Snap Shots! That’s an internet faux pas :(

I actually really do prefer the old template. It’s a lot more calm, organized, and easy to read. The new one has a lot of trouble helping the reader distinguish between posts. That and the new version is very crowded — there’s a lot of unnecessary stuff on the home page. And, even if it’s CSS-validated, it still has about 56 HTML errors, so you’re still probably better off with the old one, provided that you validate its CSS :/

]]>